Everyday police encounters that turn deadly

There are all sorts of tragedies in life, of which, one of those tragedies is when someone who has the responsibility to protect and  to serve, somehow misconstrues that protection and service, into the use of deadly force in those types of interactions, in which, that subsequent event did not and should not have had to end with a tragic outcome.  The thing about the police in America, is that they are completely militarized, and in certain areas of this nation see themselves as therefore essentially going into hostile territory, and whenever civilians are consistently being perceived as being dangerous to the public safety, or perhaps of more relevance, to those of the police force, even that which is ordinary can quickly morph into the extraordinary and thus tragedy.

There are plenty of people that are rightfully afraid of and leery of the police.  That type of mindset, is actually sensible, because police officers seemingly have the impunity to arrest anyone that they so desire, to physically abuse anyone that they so wish, and if necessary, to use lethal force against anyone that gets on their wrong side.  For all those that believe that this is an exaggeration, it can't be, because time and time again, everyday interactions between members of the general public and police happen, in which, that member of the general public, ends up having their life terminated at the hands of the police, despite the fact that they were never even reasonably endangering anybody or anything, and were not a menace to the public order.

Those that are taught, that the world is a dangerous place, and of which, lethal firearms and other weapons are absolutely necessary in order to maintain proper law and order, are therefore going to fundamentally see that world as a place in which force is going to have to be exerted, because without such force being exerted on the supposed behalf of the public safety, then society, will  invariably devolve eventually into utter mayhem and chaos.  So then, for police officers, every encounter with the general public, in which, that officer doesn't feel comfortable, because, for instance, of racial reasons, socioeconomic differences, neighborhood reasons,  or an inherent bias, is going to be fraught with tension, and those that are under pressure, are going to react differently than those that are not.

What makes an everyday encounter with a police officer, that turns deadly, so tragic, is the very fact that it need not have happened.  When a given person gets pulled over for a traffic violation, or is just walking or hanging out in their neighborhood, or is having a problem with their mental clarity, these are, in and of themselves, situations that do not and should not necessitate deadly force – yet it happens, far too often.  The main reason that the ordinary can and does turn into the extraordinary is because the mindset of that police officer isn't right – and it isn't right because that officer sees the society that they are a member of, not as civilized, but as uncivilized, which thus opens the door to taking  that action which will terminate that perceived uncivilized element.

Employers v. Employees

The United States is a capitalistic society, currently structured in which non-union employees, or employees without a contract, are often considered to be employed "at will," or translated correctly, employed at the seemingly arbitrary will of their employer.  That is to say, no matter how much a given employee appreciates their job and benefits, as well as their salary, and works hard, we find that in absence of an actual labor or contractual agreement that they are a party to, they can be terminated at any given moment for no reason, at all, by their employer and thereby become unemployed.

While there are indeed legislative laws which do provide employees with all sorts of rights, so that if an employee believes that they have been discriminated against or have been terminated illegally, which thus appears then to violate those rights, they do have some legal recourse.  Additionally, there is the fact that those that are laid off or have been released from employment are often eligible for unemployment pay, which provides them with monetary benefits at a reduced portion of their salary amount for a finite period of time  That said, though, the bottom line is that there are few people that ever welcome being let go, and many a person, when so losing their job, are not only stressed from such, but are soon put into a precarious financial situation.

The thing about financial responsibilities, is that those financial responsibilities and bills, are ever relentless, and therefore whenever an anticipated income stream is disrupted, the pressure to find a resolution to such is intensified.  This is why, labor unions are so important to the working population, and obviously of immense importance to all those that labor within industries, in which they are seemingly easily replaceable.  The fact that employees, have no security, and can be implicitly threatened with someone else to take their place or perhaps for some machine to perform their duties, or even with the closure of a given location, signifies that these employees are pretty much going to have to accept then whatever the labor conditions are for the job that they have.

This means that employers are in the catbird seat of determining the labor rate of their employees, the corresponding work conditions, and the labor hours and days to be worked by those employees.  While any employee at any time, can state their case as to why they should make a higher wage, or request different hours, or desire more robust benefits; their voice, without a labor union backstopping them, is a lone voice, and often then, not only an ineffective voice, but could be a voice, that endangers their own employment.

The fact of the matter is, that millions of laboring Americans, don't have any logical reason to celebrate Labor Day, because they don't actually have any labor power, aren't going to have any labor power over their employer, ever, and are susceptible at any time of day, then, of being terminated from their employment, with possibly rather tragic consequences.    Those that live in America deserve so much better, and in absence of a re-invigoration of actual labor unions, then the governance of this nation needs to be not only the employee of last resort for its people, but also see that all those that are employed are paid a living wage.

Unequal justice under discriminatory law

No western nation, locks up more of its own people, than the nation that claims the mantle of being the bastion of liberty, freedom, and opportunity.   This would presuppose that there is indeed a serious disconnect between what the United States professes to be and what it so actually is.  It would seem then that America must then be a nation that has some very troubling societal problems that are unsolvable, and also systemic – for why else would they have so many criminals?

Yet, as many as this nation has locked up, the makeup of those so incarcerated, clearly reflects that America has a propensity and a preference to lock up those that are minorities, ill-educated, poor, defenseless, un-championed, as well as often these people originating from environments that are not conductive to the creation of good citizens.  This then is a clear indication that when it comes to criminality, that America has a penchant to lock up in particular, certain peoples, probably because they are easy targets to incarcerate, and based upon that fact, discriminatory.

The thing about America is that because it is the wealthiest nation that the world has ever known, and of which, there seems to be inborn within Americans, an abiding desire to “keep up with the Joneses” that this definitely breeds an attitude for many a person, of doing whatever that it takes to achieve success, licit or illicit.  So then, in America, there is also a fairly sizable amount of what has been designated as “white-collar” crime, in which the crimes so being committed, are non-violent to other people, and thus consist of fraudulent activities so meant to extract money, by unjust means, in a clearly illicit way from the party that has been victimized to the other party so committing that white-collar crime. 

The thing about crimes being committed by impoverished people, is that it doesn’t much matter what the Constitution does or does not stipulate, the bottom line is that people without money and without status are going to be routinely convicted, because they have not the tools or the knowledge to successfully fight against a conviction, and in consideration that well over 90% of criminal cases are resolved through a plea bargain, which is basically a form of coercion, the disenfranchised of America, are going to thus be locked up.  On the other hand, a lot of those people, that commit white-collar crimes, actually have some money, though, of course, they want more; and frequently they have some access to people of influence, or if lacking that, a connection to a competent attorney that knows the ropes.

So then, rob a bank for $500, go to jail for twenty years; but on the other hand, embezzle thousands upon thousands of dollars, or trade in the market via insider knowledge, and in a lot of those cases, a deal will be worked out, in which, no time will be served, of which, a typical result might be a lessening of the charges, leading to a monetary fine, and perhaps some community service, as well.  In this nation, those that know the right people, or have influence, or can lawyer up, are going to find that the law works entirely differently for them, as opposed to those that have nothing; because in America, it’s all about punishing the weak, and treating those with influence, favorably.

The dangerous drivers of the United States of America

America likes to believe that it is #1 in virtually every category of significance, and certainly believes that it leads the world in all sorts of hi-technology innovations. The thing about vehicles, is that, in recent years, we have seen more and more safety features so meant to not only protect drivers from actual fatalities, but also to mitigate injuries, and even of more importance, to prevent an accident from happening in the first place. One would think that with features such as blind spot detection, lane assist, backup cameras, forward collision warning, adaptive headlights, pedestrian detection, traffic-sign recognition, automatic emergency braking, and driver attention monitoring systems, that quite obviously both fatalities and injuries would be appreciably lower for every 100 million vehicle miles so traveled – in addition, to their simply being less collisions even occurring.

Yet, when we look at the statistics as reported at cdan.nhtsa.gov, and we compare the year 2010 to the year 2020, we find that fatalities per 100 million miles traveled is at 1.34 for 2020, as compared to 1.11 in 2010. As for injuries, per 100 million miles traveled this is at 79 in 2020, as compared to 76 in 2010. In short, despite all the advanced technology devices so meant to make driving safer and to assist the vehicle driver in being safer, the actual result demonstrates conclusively that the United States has actually regressed from the years 2010 to 2020. In other words, people driving today, are susceptible to not only slightly more injuries than back in 2010, but also a meaningfully higher fatality rate.

The thing about vehicle collisions of all types, is that there quite obviously is a comprehensive database that determines the proximate cause of such collisions occurring. Perhaps the United States does not pay much attention to that information, or perhaps they do, but have subsequently not made meaningful moves to improve the rules and regulations that would therefore serve to help to reduce such, or maybe they have, but whatever has been implemented, somehow has not worked as planned. The bottom line is that those that care about reducing vehicle collisions have not been effective in actually seeing that reduced, despite all the new safety features, that would presuppose that this would obviously serve to reduce those accidents and incumbent fatalities to historically low rates.

It would be one thing, that despite this regression in regards to vehicle collisions and fatalities, that the United States in comparison to other European nations, still had the best vehicle safety record amongst them; but alas, in reality, the United States compares very poorly to European nations in regards to vehicle collisions and fatalities. This should be real cause for concern, and should be something that the United States needs to make it a point to substantially improve upon – especially in consideration that the overall cost of a vehicle in the United States, is at an all-time high. This would imply, then, when it comes to vehicles in the United States, that the overall safety of the driver, despite the hi-technology so having been added to address such, is still not a high enough priority in the manufacture and sale of those vehicles, or perhaps American drivers are in aggregate, dangerous.

Honesty and dishonesty

There isn’t going to be a lot of people that would ever voluntarily admit to being straight-up dishonest. The reason that this is the case, is because most people do not like those that are known for being incorrigible, cheats, liars, and dishonest – which is to be expected, because people that have very bad reputations that are universally known by everyone, aren’t going to be welcomed as friends very often, because they are just too much trouble to deal with, and are basically seen then as being damaged and unreliable goods.

So then, most people make a point to at least try to come across to others as being basically honest, even when their behavior and actions surely indicate that they are not, because to be perceived as being wholly dishonest is a very bad place to be. What does help very dishonest people, though, is the fact that most people recognize within their own character that they aren’t always honest, so more times than not, having as a friend someone that lies from time-to-time, but not always, is seen as being okay, especially if those lies do not personally impact the other, because they themselves know that in their own heart, that they lie, sometimes too.

It has been said that honesty is the best policy, but what we so see around us, belies that proverb being lived; for many a person, lies a heck of a lot more than they willingly acknowledge or will admit to, and therefore they do not live up to the creed of actually being honest. That is to say, if honesty is one of those things, in which, a given person, can choose when they so want to be honest, as well as when it is convenient for them to be dishonest, and still believe that somehow that they are basically honest – then what we will so see, is people being dishonest, primarily in those cases, when the consequences of being honest will cost them something that they are unwilling to give up. In other words, there are a significant amount of people, that insist that they are fundamentally honest, because to cut to the chase, they only lie when they have to lie. That, in a nutshell, is the problem when people believe that being honest 99% of the time, signifies that they are honest people – conveniently forgetting that they lie 100% of the time, when it really matters.

A truly honest person, will unwillingly or not, face the music, and thus own up to their action or inaction that has been called into question. That person is a person of integrity, and should be credited for at least being honest, even though, they have clearly done something wrong. Those that admit to a mistake, a fault, an error, and of which, to make that admission, will cause them to “lose face,” to be punished, to be ostracized, or perhaps even worse, have shown that though their action was wrong, that they are at least willing to be fairly judged for who they really are. On the other hand, those that hide behind the façade of being honest, when they have in fact, been dishonest, don’t have the integrity to be judged for who they really are, because they lack the courage to show their true colors.

Hi-technology knows just about everything about us

We live in a modern world, which is digitally connected through, for instance, our smart phones and through our activities on the internet, for business as well as for leisure. The thing about the structure of our digital life, is that the government to a very large extent has taken a laissez-faire type of approach, so that, for the most part, whatever information that the hi-technology companies that we deal with directly or indirectly so desire to collect from us, is theirs then for the taking. This is the fundamental mistake that the governance of this nation has made, because essentially it allows private enterprise to vacuum up as much information as they so desire from us, including our “digital breadcrumbs” to thus create for them, a very detailed profile of who and what we really are. Further to the point, the reason why hi-technology is able to know so much about us, is that hi-technology fundamentally keeps track of, collates, organizes, and forever remembers every single thing that we do, which provides then these hi-technology firms with an almost god-like view of who and what we are really all about.

Sure, there are plenty of people, that don’t really care about what is or what is not recorded or known about them, but a lot of those people, don’t seem to comprehend, that the more that is known about anybody, the more potential there is to exploit that person, to redirect that person, and to manipulate that person, so that they will behave in a manner that is beneficial to those hi-technology companies, by the purchases, the decisions, and the overall attitude that is thus displayed by those individuals. There are lots of people that somehow believe that they can’t be influenced or are never influenced, but if that indeed was true, then there wouldn’t be a multi-billion dollar advertising industry, and there wouldn’t be ads upon ads structured upon the searches that we have made, or the relevant demographics exposed of who we are, that thus subsequently “pop up” as advertisements upon our screen. The bottom line is that this capitalistic system is dependent upon having people making decisions that favor their products, and the more that a given company knows about their intended audience, the better they are at focusing on what needs to occur to trigger that buying mechanism.

Additionally, hi-technology companies are absolutely enamored by young people, and the younger that they can so reach them, the better – because those that are young are going to go through all the various stages of life, in which each of those stages, is going to provide for those hi-technology companies and for the for-profit corporations that work intimately with those hi-technology companies, the continuous opportunity, to direct a given person’s attention their way and for their profit. While it is true that most human beings are complicated beings, that is why then it is so important for these hi-technology companies to know everything about us, for in that knowing, they know what our next probable move is going to be, and because of that, they can position themselves to exploit such for their own benefit, so ultimately done at our expense.

Drug addiction, welfare, and money

There are plenty of people that have substance abuse problems, including licit drugs that are either abused by being overprescribed to them or by which that person has gained access to through deception; as well as the fact that there are all those myriad illicit drugs that are also abused. The bottom line is that there are a whole lot of people that have drug addiction problems in America, and of which, the governance of this nation, is quite readily aware of this situation, which appears to have become endemic.

We should give credit to any nation that recognizes a problem and desires then to put forth an effort to ameliorate such – such as we see in the provision of rehab centers, welfare assistance, and social assistance of all types; of which, this, in and of itself, does provide some real relief and aid to those, for instance, that are drug addicted, and appears to be successful for some of those people so addicted. Still, in consideration, that drug addiction is so prevalent, and does not in any respect, appear to be actually diminishing or becoming something of irrelevancy, there needs to be acknowledged that perhaps the more seminal question to ask, is what are the factors that drive people to drug abuse in the first place. That is to say, a far better way to resolve a problem, is to address the very basis for why such a problem like that, ever develops.

In point of fact, though it can be said, that just about anyone could become susceptible to substance abuse problems, it though has to be recognized, that those that typically turn to drugs, are often the same sorts of people that have proximate problems as well as a sense of hopelessness about those problems, and that they cannot themselves figure out a way to successfully resolve such, so then they thus turn to that which will, at least for a little while, relieve them of being burdened with that particular concern. In other words, stated differently, healthy and vibrant societies, are the types of societies, in which, drug abuse and anti-social behavior are far less prevalent, because people, in general, that are happy with their lot in life, don’t have a compelling need to desire to distort their reality by drugs that will addle their mind.

So too, the problem with spending lots of governmental money in the hopes of resolving drug abuse issues, without careful accountability to how that money is being spent, or how effective that money is in actually resolving drug addiction is a major mistake; especially in consideration, that damaged people that are abusing drugs, are going to be very susceptible to taking whatever form of help being issued for them, and thereby habitually finding a way to turn the assistance so being provided to them, as a way and means to get more access to those drugs. That is to say, there isn’t any greater shame in the expenditure of billions of dollars upon resolving drug addiction, in which the users of those drugs, trade then their welfare help to those that are the providers of those drugs, so that, in effect, monies earmarked to help the addicted, actually end up in the hands of those that are the exploiters of such addiction, in the first place.

Riots don’t occur by people that have a vested interest in their neighborhood

Imagine a neighborhood in which virtually everybody that lived within that neighborhood, owned their own homes. Those types of neighborhoods that have a very high percentage of their residents that live in owner-occupied homes, are almost never going to see those same people do anything that would purposely severely damage their homes, because of the fact that they actually live there, as well as the fact that their property is of immense value to them; in addition, to the salient fact that most rational people do not ever destroy that which has sizeable value, whether either personal or tangible..

So then, it’s fair to say, that riots never occur in very nice neighborhoods, not so much because the people that live there are very nice, though, they may well be; but basically, because each of the people living there have a vested interest in their neighborhood remaining very nice. On the other hand, there are those neighborhoods that are known more for being or in having pockets of despair, pockets of poverty, pockets of neglect, and pockets of frustration, in which, many of those that are owners of these properties or have businesses within or around the surrounding neighborhood, are primarily people that actually don’t live in the neighborhood, and don’t necessarily care a lot about it, or of the people that actually live there. Further to the point, whenever people in a neighborhood, believe that their landlord, or that the neighborhood store, does not seem to care for them, and treat them in a way and manner, in which they feel dehumanized, disrespected, or exploited, this breeds discontent.

As for riots, there comes a point when those that feel that they have no voice, and further that their situation is well-nigh hopeless, in which, oftentimes, we find that some significant event that has recently occurred is perceived as being so unjust to the people that live or congregate within that neighborhood, that this serves to set off the powder keg that was always susceptible to going completely off, and hence the riot begins. The riot that so ensues, is primarily going to be in the neighborhood in which the people that live there, have little or no vested interest in that neighborhood, because they own so little of it, and care not for it, or their situation within it, which is why they are just fine with the destruction, burning, and damage that is so caused by that ensuing riot.

Those that have nothing, are not going to behave in the same manner as those that have something, for those without, see themselves as being outside the system, and not an integral part of it. The objective, then, of any sensible neighborhood or society, is to at least attempt to reach out to those that have the greatest need, so as to have them to believe that they are actually desirable, needed, valuable, and of worth, by creating the conditions that give credence to such a belief. So then, give a person a reason to live and they will live. On the other hand, take away their dreams and hopes, and the most likely result will be rebellion, revolution, and rioting.

The elites and political capture

One might think that governmental laws, as well as the rules and regulations so set, do matter, when it comes to those important things, for example, such as the environment, taxation, corporate collusion, and labor issues.  What needs to be recognized, though, is whenever the fox is guarding the henhouse, then whatever that fox so wants and needs for itself, or for those that it answers to, then the result will always almost be in conformance with the desires of that fox.

It would be a mistake to ever believe that in the richest nation that the world has ever known -- that lots of concentrated money somehow would not have an incredible influencing power upon those actions so taken and subsequently judged upon in regards to business enterprises, by those that have the authority as public servants, to appropriately do that very thing.  In other words, while there are myriad ways for anybody or any institution to stand up and to make their case to the general public or to legislatures – the thing about the influence that money can buy, is that the easiest route to make sure that what needs to occur or not to occur, is to either have an undue influence upon critical public servants or basically to be that actual public servant, itself. 

Those then, that are public servants that have either been captured by the elites that have plenty of influence and power to exert upon them, or have been appointed to their position specifically by the elites to serve them, are going to do, way more times than not, exactly what those elites want, because they know then that taking care of the elites will be rather lucrative for them, on some level or another.  Because those elites have so much money and power, in addition, to the vital connections that they have developed, then pretty much whatever that they want they are going to get, whenever those that they deal with, are themselves corrupt, weak, malleable, or without principle. 

Whenever that government, of, for, and by the people, is not, in essence, actually any of those things, because those governmental representatives have been captured or have sold themselves to the elites of this nation, then the people effectively have had their democratic voice, nullified. So then, when the very people that are in charge of enforcing the law, implementing the law, and judging the law, on behalf of the people, aren’t actually doing their job in a responsible and diligent manner because they have been compromised or are corrupt, than the end result is not going to be beneficial for the people, in whole, but rather is going to be beneficial for those that are the actuators of such.

The important thing to keep in the foremost of one’s mind, is that the elites of this world, aren’t the same type of people, that desire to hold onto their power and influence for only a short finite period of time, but often want to hold onto their power for their own or for their progeny or for their corporations’ benefit, for as long as possible.  That is why the elites need political capture, because only in the accomplishment of that, can they be assured that what they so have and desire to have more of, will not be successfully challenged.

Corporate Executive Office pay, stock options, and share pricing

On the surface, it seems to make sense that tying corporate officer extra compensation pay with the increase in the share price of a given corporation, has got to be a win-win situation; in the sense that the corporate officers that are successful in accomplishing such, thus get more compensation, while the shareholders get the benefit of an increasing share price, as well; and possibly also, a higher dividend payment.  As good as this might be, there are several factors not taken into prudent consideration, of which, the most important one, is that the compensation package so being provided to all the other non-executive employees, along with their other benefits, has over the last few decades, seen that the gap between their pay against executive pay, which was already pretty outrageous, even back in the 1980s, that the ratio of the pay of those in the executive office compared to regular employees, has gotten ever increasingly greater over recent decades.  Additionally, whenever a substantial amount of the profits so made at a company are thus utilized to buy back its own shares, this means that the monies so earned, have not thus been earmarked for expansion, or for research and development, or for an increase in pay for regular employees, or basically for anything else that would be of benefit for those that are employed there, but rather the main purpose in buying back one’s own stock, is to help “jack” the price of that respective stock, higher.  Also, to believe that the overriding reason why corporations are able to make good profits, somehow comes down to almost exclusively those in the executive offices, is virtually never true, especially for those corporations that employ thousands of people and have offices all over the world.

There is though, another valid reason, for why the executive office, should not have their additional compensation tied so lucratively to the stock price, which has an awful lot to do with the fact that highly intelligent and clever people, that are motivated by money, above all, are going to be susceptible to doing the types of things that will get them that money, whether or not, this is good for the corporation, at large, for the long term, or not.  In other words, any incentive which is structured in a way in which the lure of that incentive is so high, is going to lend itself to being “gamed,” by those that don’t care for much of anything other than how that they can get their hands on that money, and if that thus means bending the rules, or breaking the rules, than such will probably be done.

To believe that all those in the executive office who already have the prestige, the power, the money, and the best of benefits, have to have even more money as an incentive to do an even better job, are short-sighted in that sort of thinking; and are inconsiderate, of that fact, that the very best well-run corporations, first make sure to fairly take care of all of those that are its employees as not only the right thing to do, but the most sensible thing to do, as well.

A legitimate government needs to be accountable to the people

When it comes to the governance, of, for, and by the people, it is imperative that our governmental representatives from top to bottom, are faithfully responsible to the people as well as to the Constitution that they are sworn to obey and to uphold.  Regrettably, that type of governance does not currently exist in the United States, because the people, to a very meaningful extent, have no real opportunity to know what their government is really up to of that which is of most importance, and thus then hold that government accountable for its subsequent actions and inactions – for our current governance consistently displays a clear lack of integrity, openness, and transparency.  Indeed, too much of present day governance involves all sorts of secrets upon secrets, hidden from not only the people, themselves; but often even hidden from those that should have the legislative oversight to see and to know what is really going on.  In short, this government, cannot be trusted, because it presents itself in a way and manner, in which that government is opaque, not forthcoming, and far too often, purposely deceitful to the people.

The very best of governments, are those that have as their very purpose, to do what is right and what is necessary for the people.  Further to the point, legitimate governments, are the type of governments, that do not obfuscate, lie, cheat, deceive, and misuse their power to the detriment of the people.  Whenever what the government is doing on behalf of the people, is not fully disclosed, debated upon, and discussed openly, then it is not thus possible for the people to have a true voice so as to approve or disapprove of such.  To believe then that the government always has the best interests of the people in mind, is belied by the fact that some of the most meaningful things so being performed by that government are forever secret, unexplained, and never open for discussion or debate with the general public.

All those that exercise the most important democratic power so provided to them in secret, are not true to what that government is supposed to so represent.  While there are certainly going to be those times when secrecy and discretion is necessary, the bottom line is that this should be the exception to the rule, and never the rule, itself.  Additionally, it hardly seems fair or right, that this government has never known so much about its own individual people about who and what they really are then what we so see at the present time – yet, in contrast, never has this government had so much that it so does and performs, be hidden behind closed doors, as pretty much being the normal course of its business.

When any government will not permit itself or has structured itself in a form in which it cannot and will not be accountable to the people, then that government is not itself, legitimate, and has become a bastardization of what good governance is all about.  It has been said, “trust, but verify,” but there can’t even be trust, when there is nothing of substance to be verified, because what needs to be verified, is not even known, or even available to be investigated, properly.  All those then, in positions of power and governance, that want trust and obedience, deserve neither, if they themselves are not open and honest.

Civilization necessitates self-restraint and self-control

For a certainty, there are plenty of people that are overly proud that America, represents for them: freedom and liberty; and not just any freedom and liberty, but pretty much this means that they can do whatever that they want, whenever that they want, forever, if they want.  Of course, even those that profess those thoughts, recognize that freedom and liberty does have to involve some degree of reasonable restraints that are necessitated, because without such, there would not really be any semblance of civilization as we know it, but rather it would basically be chaos.

The main reason why we have so many laws, rules, and regulations, is to temper humankind’s desire for absolute liberty, with reasonable restraints that thus serve to not only help to secure and benefit the public, at large, but also as a way and means to keep people from basically infringing upon the rights of others, that would be violated, if these laws, rules, and regulations were not so imposed.  That is to say, our liberty can never be a one-way street, in which everything that we so desire to do, is ours for the taking, because in a society like that, doing that is going to inevitably create conflict with all those that have different ideas and different desires that they so wish to invoke and indulge in.  So then, without reasonable self-restraint and self-control being exercised within society, we do so find that not too surprisingly, there won’t be enough paper in the world, to thus conceive of all the laws, rules, and regulations so needed, that would fairly take into account every conceivable contingency that would invariably come up.  Rather, what we find is that for a wholesome civilization to exist and to thrive, this thus necessitates that each individual demonstrate their capacity to utilize suitable self-restraint and self-control for the greater good of that society.

That is to say, laws, rules, and regulations, no matter how well written or how sound in structure, have a tendency to be bent, ignored, or not enforced consistently, so that effectively, they aren’t going to be as robust as envisioned or intentioned.  On the other hand, people that have developed appropriate self-control and self-restraint, and further know what they really should or should not be doing, and thus exercise proper discretion in their interactions with one another, are going to help make for a better civilization, as opposed to those that aren’t able to control or to restrain their selves.  

Those then that believe that all we really need in order to have a good civilization is more law and order, don’t seem to recognize that all the law and order in the world, will never be enough to control or restrain any population, if they are unwilling to amend their ways, because they don’t desire to do so, don’t think it’s right, or perhaps don’t know any better.  That is why it is so important, that we properly educate people to know that the freedom and liberty that we so desire to have, has incumbent responsibilities placed upon each individual, and when we appropriately exercise self-restraint and self-control we are thus doing our fair part to make for a better civilization, for all.

High Frequency Trading (HFT) should be banned

A significant portion of Americans have investments in the stock market, via their IRA account, or through their 401K account, or through their own brokerage account.  The current market capitalization of the S&P 500, as of June, 2023, is $36.609 trillion, of which those 500 leading companies, represent approximately 80% of the entire market capitalization of the United States stock market.  So then, as it has been said, the best place to make money at or to take money from, is where the money actually is, and that amount of money as so represented by the S&P 500, is absolutely staggering.

High Frequency Trading (HFT) is something that is of very recent vintage, in which, the buying and selling of stock equities are conducted utilizing sophisticated algorithmic trading, so done at speeds that are measured in the milliseconds, in which these HFT companies, execute trades of buying and then selling the same equities so bought, in a matter of those milliseconds, in which their profit, is extremely small, but the volume of what they are so trading is quite large.  The way then that HFT makes their money, without risk, is basically HFT firms getting out in front, by milliseconds, of legitimate stock orders so being made by institutional or retail traders, and then they make their profit, by getting that equity at a slightly cheaper price, whereupon they then sell such to that institutional or retail trader.  This then, done often enough, can make for those HFT firms, profits in the millions upon millions of dollars, for basically “front running” stock after stock after stock.

We read at businessinsider.com, that “In its IPO prospectus, High Frequency Trading firm Virtu reveals it had one losing trading day in 1,238 days of trading.”  That, in and of itself, is proof positive, that HFT is clearly an unfair advantage so executed by HFT firms at the expense of institutional and retail investors.  Further to the point, those profits so going to HFT firms, essentially represent monies being extracted from institutional and retail investors, that provides no appreciable benefit, to society, at large, but rather an exclusive and unfair benefit to these HFT firms.

While HFT firms should be properly banned from trading, the best way to deal with such, is probably the simplest, which is to impose an extremely small financial transaction fee tax on each and every trade of stock so made on the stock exchange.  This tax, would be tiny enough, that to the institutional and retail sellers, it would not make much of a difference, and such a tax as that, could also be rebated to institutional and retail buyers, if they held onto a given security for at least a period of six months.  On the other hand, a financial transaction fee attached to every share so sold and bought, would severely damage the HFT trading model.  Additionally, if this wasn’t enough to put HFT firms out of business, a new tax bracket should be created, in which equities held for a period of less than one week, would be taxed at a rate of at least 50%, and preferably more.

The thing about HFT trading is that it produces absolutely no benefit to society, but rather serves essentially as a trading model which imposes upon institutions and regular investors, an unfair disadvantage that they cannot overcome because of HFT front running, which thus serves to beat them to the punch, by milliseconds, ad nauseum. 

Land is money

America is a nation with an awful lot of land, in fact, America has about the same amount of land mass as both China and Canada, but the land that America owns and occupies, is more conducive for civilization, agriculture, travel, industry, and overall beneficence.  The only nation, that clearly has more land than America is Russia, but a significant portion of Russian land is uninhabited because that land consists of unrelenting permafrost.

A meaningful amount of Americans are rather poor at history, or perhaps don’t seem to really care much about history, and so then there seems to be a consensus in America, that America has pretty much always been a land that consists of two coasts, along with a border with Mexico, so situated at the Rio Grande; in addition to its border with Canada at the forty-ninth parallel.  The fact of the matter is that America’s landmass was considerably smaller when it was first formed as a nation-state, of which, from its inception, it decided to forcefully take land away from American Indians, primarily through battles and broken treaties.

It is important to remember that America is a nation that compelled American Indians to be removed from their native lands, and then essentially placed those that did not die from an often inhumane relocation effort, to live upon reservations, of which this land, frequently so represented the most worthless of lands.  So too, when it comes to Mexico, a sizeable amount of the landmass of the United States, comes from Mexico having ceded 529,000 square miles of its land, or nearly 55% of what was Mexico, to the United States, from an unjust war, so made upon Mexico, for the expressed purpose to get that land.  Finally, when it comes to those that are African-Americans, these people came to America, involuntarily, in chains, and were slaves, and thus had no right as chattel property, to ever own land on their own.

In short, America became a nation with a large landmass by hook and by crook, of which, that landmass primarily benefited those of the favored race.  That is to say, when it comes to the wealth of White Americans, the seminal dividing line between those of the favored race, compared against African-Americans or Hispanics, is home ownership, in which that home ownership percentage for Whites is 75%; whereas for African-Americans and Hispanics this is under 50%.  This disparity in home ownership as well as the overall value and quality of the homes so owned by these respective races, has existed from the inception of the United States.  That is to say, White people got all the privileges of the opportunity to own land, and to their credit, did something of merit with such; whereas, American Indians, African-Americans, and Hispanics, were historically denied fair access to such, and have not experienced since then anything really approaching a level playing field or any real consideration of reparations, thereof. 

Those then, that own land, essentially have an asset which typically appreciates quite nicely in value; whereas, those that don’t own land have to continually pay the landlord for the privilege of having a place to lay their head upon.  The difference then, is that those with land are the very same as those that have money, and those without land, are typically those that own little or nothing.

Dehumanization is the fuel that feeds racism

It’s disappointing that in the 21st century, that there still is so much racism and prejudice that we still see and feel today in most western nations, of which, we should really know better.  The first part of why there remains so much implicit and explicit racism, for example, in America, comes down to the disappointing lack of knowledge displayed by so many of the favored race, and thus then their overall ignorance which thus leads them quite often to becoming racists in their viewpoint.  In other words, those that are of the favored race and are poorly educated, are going to often lack the capacity to do the research, to think for themselves, and to cogitate, so as to understand better what racism really means and what it is all about.  The second part of racism has an awful lot to do with the hierarchy that America  has represented historically and still basically represents, in which, those that are of the favored race are basically confirmed through our educational system, to be essentially the master race of America, and thus all other races and ethnicities, are hence no better than second best or worse.

That said, to add further fuel to the fire, of racism, it is of fundamental importance to those that are racists, to find an avenue that makes sense to them, that will thus belittle the other, dehumanize the other, and marginalize the other, so that it would appear to these racists, that their racial position, makes logical sense.  That is to say, to fairly judge another of the unfavored race by their actual merits and capabilities, along with keeping in mind other pertinent considerations that are relevant to this very thing, is never something that racists are going to be prone to considering, because that actually might make them be open to changing their mind, or adjusting their opinion, which they are wont not to do.  Rather, their preference is to find something that is common to a particular race and not such of their own, and focus almost exclusively upon that, in a way and manner, which dehumanizes the other, by making the other appear to be less than human, and thus more akin to an animal, of which, those that are thus considered to be animals, are thereby categorized as being under the rightful dominion of exclusively those of humankind.

So too, to dehumanize the other is necessary for racism, because once it has been determined by racists that the other is not human, pretty much anything goes in the treatment of those that have been dehumanized, no matter how diabolical and evil those actions subsequently are.  In truth, while most people can indeed be reasonable most of the time, we do so find, that when their blood is up, that they then are also quite capable of committing the types of acts, that no sane person, would ever consider doing, all done, with nary a second thought.  In short, to eliminate racism, the dehumanization of the other must first be eradicated, and until that has been accomplished and thus thoroughly purged from the minds of humankind, certain those of the favored race, will continue their racist ways, until the very end of time. 

Organized crime and the rise of drug trafficking

That which we call organized crime, has been around in one form or another, since civilizations were first created; in the sense, that there is almost always going to be some sort of underworld activity going on in a given society, because many a person or organization, has a preference to make their money, or their livelihood, not by doing something constructure, but rather by taking advantage of other people’s proclivities or weaknesses, for the expressed benefit of that organization, that performs such.

America is a nation that leads the world in the amount of prescription drugs so consumed, which thus also lends itself to being a nation with a tendency to desire to ingest illicit drugs of all sorts, in the hopes that by taking these drugs, prescribed or not, that they will thus receive some desirable return from such.  Additionally, America is the richest nation in the world, of which, a significant amount of its peoples, have time on their hands to indulge into whatever that is of interest to them.  Also, America is a rather large country, with borders that can be readily crossed by land, sea, or by air, and of which, based upon the sheer amount of humans successfully trafficking themselves into this nation, proves then, that crossing the border with illicit drugs, is not going to be all that problematic.

When it comes to organized crime, the main business that organized crime is actually in, is the business of making money.  So then, while organized crime, has historically concentrated on prostitution, loan sharking, gambling, bootlegging, and other assorted activities that are seen as being both immoral and illegal, the bottom line is organized crime doesn’t care so much about what the business proposition is, but rather cares more about the best way to improve their gross margins, with the least amount of work and legal concerns to deal with.  The thing about drug trafficking, is that business is not only highly lucrative, but also we do find that the actual goods being trafficked are, with the exception of marijuana, compact and very small in structure, which thus lends itself to far more ease and flexibility in trafficking those drugs from one destination to another.

So too, when it comes to illicit drugs, that business is going to be desirable, because the “high” off of illicit drugs, only lasts a fairly brief transitory period of time – signifying that the person that so buys today, is going to be very susceptible to buying tomorrow, or if not right then and there, then next weekend, when they go out and party again.  Additionally, the overall price of illicit drugs per the dosage so consumed, is typically very reasonable, which is good for not only repeat business, but also good for the solicitation of customers in the first place. 

All of this clearly indicates that drug trafficking is the place to be for organized crime, because there is not only a very willing consumer base that wants such, but also of high importance, the profitability of the drug trafficking is excellent, which thus makes it easy to utilize that money so being made, to pay off, as necessary, those that need to be paid off, so that this relentless cycle can continue, unabated; of which, the only people typically being caught for drug trafficking are “nobodies” without connections, while the real money is being made hand over fist, by organized crime.

To be poor in the land of the rich

We are told that there is no shame in being poor, but in reality, that is situation dependent.  In other words, when you live in a very poor country and are basically surrounded by fellow poor people, then there truly is no shame in being poor, because just about everyone else is also poor, and further to the point, those that are in communities of impoverishment, typically work together in order to sustain and uphold themselves from an even worse fate.  However, when you are poor in the richest nation that the world has ever known, and of which, each day you are inundated with all sorts of social media posts, advertisements, and entertainment videos, that constantly celebrates the material success of other people or its accouterments, thereof; then being poor, is really a rather difficult lot to bear.

So then, while there are plenty of people that talk about how the poor in America, have so much more than what the middle class had back in the day – what they are really talking about are material things such as cell phones, televisions, ready wear clothing, indoor plumbing, the internet, refrigerators, and other items that simply didn’t exist back in that day and age—of which, if they had so existed for a given individual, back then, this would have marked that person as being very successful, indeed.  In point of fact, the poor often feel miserable and disadvantaged, not because they have absolutely nothing, but because what they so have, basically represents the bottom of the barrel in the hierarchy of the United States; and further to the point, because each of us is also prone to comparing ourselves to one another, this thereby becomes an almost unbearable discomfort to them.  Additionally, those that are poor in America, often are poor, from day one, in which, because they lack the necessary ingredients for success, such as a stable home life, a good education, healthy outlets for their youthful energy, as well as gainful opportunity, are pretty much consigned then to a substandard life, especially in comparison to what so many others have, in this the land of plenty.

Because America loves to toot its horn about how great that America is, we do so find that for those that have not experienced that greatness, whatsoever, that being a poor American is a rather bitter pill to swallow; for though other peoples in other nations, are cognizant that not everyone in America is a material success, they still do typically believe that America is that golden land of opportunity, and have thus bought into the belief that hard work in America will bring success.  Rather, it would be more honest to state, that hard work will bring success, but not necessarily to that person so working hard, because America doesn’t believe in paying a living wage, nor in having a good public educational system for all, nor in affordable healthcare for all, nor in safe communities for all, nor in  justice or equality for all.  Instead, America believes it needs the poor, for deliberate exploitation purposes, so that the privileged can live better, at the poor people’s expense.

Theodore Roosevelt’s Square Deal

Theodore Roosevelt was President of the United States, more than one century ago, of which, the square deal that Roosevelt was a strong proponent of, seems to be something that not every American is actually receiving as being part of this land, of, for, and by the people.  Roosevelt stated that “A man who is good enough to shed his blood for the country is good enough to be given a square deal afterwards.”  And further, Roosevelt, said “We must see that each is given a square deal, because he is entitled to no more and should receive no less."

What Roosevelt had to say, hardly seems controversial, in which, first of all, those that serve their nation through the armed forces, or through civil service, or through other public based professions which are conducted for the betterment of the people of this country, deserve to receive in return, a square deal, which should include a living wage, healthcare, and a society to live in, which is safe and vibrant.  So too, all those people that work hard, deserve for their labor, a square deal, as well, for they are helping to strengthen the economy, and deserve no less from this the richest nation that the world has ever known.

Further to the point, part of having a square deal, is for this government, to step in, when so necessary, to see that each American is provided with the basis to live a good life, by having fair access to a good public education, as well as a safe community to live in, which thereby consists of amenities such as public parks, playgrounds, the arts, and libraries.  So too, every American deserves the fair opportunity to be employed, and, if so necessary, to be employed by that government, for sensible public endeavors so created for the improvement and addition of necessary infrastructure, for remediation of environmental damage, and for just about anything that will thus provide a material benefit for the people.

The objective of any good governance that believes that its people truly deserve a square deal, is to actively put together the necessary ingredients for this to thus become actualized.  After all, words on a piece of paper, or when we express the best of sentiments, that subsequently are not diligently addressed meaningfully, aren’t going to do all that much good for anyone.  The question that ought to be asked, is why hasn’t this nation done more to fundamentally improve the lot of those people who are its most vulnerable and thus exposed to the toxic effects of being marginalized, and effectively ignored by the “last great hope of humankind.”

The fair measure of any nation, should never be about what the superrich, elite, and privilege, so own and control; but should rather be the overall character of that nation – thus best represented by the people, in whole, from rich to poor, from urban to rural, from the west coat to the east coast, and everything in-between.  If this really is the United States of America, what better way to be united than to be united in the abiding principle that every man, woman, and child is deserving of the fair opportunity to have a square deal, for that so represents the very foundation of what makes a nation great, and always will be.

Kids got to play

Those of us that are adults, have thus gone through the childhood stage of life, and of which, if we have been fortunate, that childhood stage helped to set us up to develop the good habits and the necessary capacity to become mature and well-rounded adults, that thereby make good decisions and are a good credit to the society that we are an active member of.  The thing about childhood, is that children have to go through a multitude of stages in order to reach adulthood, and of which, those stages can be challenging and troublesome, especially for the most vulnerable amongst us.  So then, as much as parents want to do their best by their children, we live in an age, in which parents are often committed to not only working outside of the home, but also don’t necessarily have the same schedule, each and every day.  In short, the days of children coming home from school, to the awaiting arms of at least one of their parents, to talk about their school day and so on, are the exception and not the rule.  Additionally, most children, have not only a lot of energy, but they are also curious about the world and their neighborhood – signifying that children have an innate desire to discover things about the world and about their own self, so accomplished through various means, including play.

There are twenty-four hours in a day, and of which, the school day only encompasses approximately seven of those hours, so naturally, children are going to have what amounts to being, a fair amount of time, that are left in their young hands or that need to be structured for their benefit, by adults.  That is why it is so important that public schools, must have in close proximity to such, public libraries, public parks, public playgrounds, public museums, and public activities.  Children need an outlet to explore the world, along with having the opportunity to make decisions when interacting with other children, so that they can learn things that aren’t necessarily taught within the confines of a schoolroom.

Those children that are provided by adults with activities that helps keep them engaged and interested, or are provided with the public space for them to take in, on their own, what so interests them in a safe environment are going to be in a far superior position to develop into responsible adults, as compared to those others, that do not have the opportunity to engage with a safe environment to explore in, and thus are susceptible to being left to the baneful influence of older misbehaving teenagers or young misfit adults that rule the roost, of their particular neighborhood.  In short, kids need safe outlets to test who and what they really are, and when parents are too involved in their own lives, or livelihood, or just don’t have the time or resources to properly supervise their children, then those children are going to turn to whatsoever seems to be available for them in their neighborhood, good or bad.  That is to say, children need constructive outlets to develop their personalities in the best way for them, and when those outlets are not constructive, but rather tend to being destructive or are meritless, then those children will be place upon a path that is not only bad for them, but bad for society.

Human beings are social creatures

It might seem rather obvious that human beings are social creatures, but by all the discourtesy, violence, and deliberate social isolation demonstrated by a fair amount of the population, this seems to make the case that we are social creatures, not so clearly obvious.  Yet, the fact of the matter is, that for better or for worse, human beings need and desire to interact with one another; and further to the point, the whole reason why families are created, and then societies are formed, is for the expressed purpose of making the lives of human beings, better and more satisfying, for their valued interaction with one another.

This thus indicates that the very basis of any good society, and of any great nation, is first and foremost to have as its principle purpose, in regards to a particular legislative act, or activity, or education, is that in its form, structure and implementation have such be for the betterment of that society, in whole.  In other words, the type of decisions that need to be made by those that are our representatives and leaders, should always be in conformance to whether or not these decisions are for the betterment of that society, of, for, and by the people.  Additionally, because we are social creatures, it is imperative, that as part of our civil education in our schooling, that each of us thus needs to be taught, how to appropriately interact with one another in a civil manner, and thereby the importance of valuing the other, even when we may have a disagreement with one another.  After all, it is far better to try to work out our differences or disputes in a civil manner, rather than to besmirch our character by violent fighting, or insulting words, which does not help in maintaining good social cohesion.

A civil society, by definition, needs its people to behave in a civil manner with one another, by demonstrating the respect that each person is entitled to, by their humanity.  That is to say, those that are destructive, ugly, hateful, and disrespectful are the type of people that build division and divisiveness within societies, and while there may indeed be legitimate reasons for such behavior, it has to be tempered by good judgment, rather than being primarily fueled by overwrought emotions.

In consideration, that we aren’t always going to see things the same way and further that the way that things presently are – does not necessarily mean that they are actually legitimately right, there thus is a real validity when certain segments of the population respond to such injustice, of not fairly being heard, and of not seeing necessary changes enacted, by exhibiting civil disobedience.  Each of us within society, should have a voice within that society, for those that are without a voice, or without a belief that they are considered to be a valued member of that society, are going to strike back at that society, for those that see themselves as outsiders to that society will have their say, one way or another – which is why the best societies are always those that are not only fair and just to all, but make it a point to reach out to those that have been left behind, as the necessary social act so needed to help keep society vibrant and healthy.