Abortion is legal in America, of which as reported by guttmahcer.org there were approximately 926,200 abortions in America in 2014, of which, since peaking in 1981, abortion has been on a long-term downward trend line. The racial makeup as reported by guttmahcer.org of those that get abortions are "White patients accounted for 39% of abortion procedures in 2014, blacks for 28%, Hispanics for 25% and patients of other races and ethnicities for 9%," in which, the American census of 2010, indicates a white population of 75.1%, blacks at 12.3%, and Hispanics at 12.5%, demonstrating quite obviously that women of color have significantly higher abortion rates than do white woman. Additionally, of those getting abortions, as reported by guttmahcer.org: "… Forty-nine percent of patients had family incomes of less than 100% of the federal poverty level… An additional 26% of patients in 2014 had incomes that were 100–199% of the poverty threshold," so that in aggregate 75% of patients receiving abortions were defined as either poor or low income women. Finally, as reported in Table 2 by guttmahcer.org, in regards to specific reasons that contributed to having an abortion, of which multiple reasons were permitted, the two most common reasons that were sited were: "having a baby would dramatically change my life," at 74%, and "can't afford a baby" at 73% for all respondents, which were also the only two responses that were given by more than 50% of those so surveyed.
This then makes it rather clear that woman that are impoverished, are significantly more inclined to get an abortion than woman that are not, indicating that in making the decision on whether or not to have a child as compared to aborting such, the income of that person is absolutely germane to that decision. While, no doubt, some people would applaud such a sensible decision to postpone having a child until one gets their financial house in order, the canary in the coal mine, is the fact that people of color are disproportionately more poor than whites in the first place, signifying that lack of income has a material effect upon who does or does not decide to have an abortion, of which people of color have decidedly more abortions basically because their economic circumstances are poorer, they are poor, and they don’t want to add to their financial burden a newborn baby, of which, if their financial circumstances were not impoverished, they would probably choose to abort far less often.
The above implies strongly an insidious prejudice that abortions clearly cut across economic lines, so that, those that are impoverished abort far more often, than those that are not. This means, whether well-intentioned or not, those that advocate to women that because their financial circumstances are suspect, that they should get an abortion, may very well be contributing to a type of economic eugenics, of which the poor are encouraged not to have children for they are poor, whereas those that have the financial means to have children are not dissuaded from doing so.
Scripture states that: "The poor you will always have with you…" (Matthew 26:11), but if you are able to convince those poor people not to procreate, you will have far less poor people to deal with, so that if you steal from the people their good educational opportunity, as well as leaving swaths of people in low-economic ghettos with little economic prospects within their domain, and then propagandize to them about the cost and responsibility of being a parent as being an unnecessary burden to carry, then doing so, will reduce their birthrate meaningfully, through the dual means of birth control and abortion, so that you won't have to actually deal with the root causes of poverty, but instead you can abort their hopes, which essentially does the same thing.