We read at Wikipedia.org that America is estimated to have 120.5 firearms per 100 residents, of which that per capita number is based upon the entire population of the country, which includes children. This is an absolutely stunning amount of firearms held by civilians, in which, if we presuppose that the primary reason why people own firearms is for their protection, it would logically follow that America must therefore be the safest country in the world, with therefore the least amount of firearms violence. In actuality, America is a very violent country, with a murder per capita rate that far exceeds every other comparable Western nation, which is indicative that the more firearms that a nation has, the more that these firearms will actually be used. Indeed, the bottom line is as long as America insists upon having the sheer number of firearms that it currently has or even more, there will not be any permanent relief from violent crime utilizing such firearms, which will continue to be consistently higher than other Western nations, unless those nations, for some reason or another, permit civilian ownership of firearms at a level approaching the United States of America.
While it certainly makes sense that people should have the right to protect and to defend themselves, it has to be admitted that the type of typical firearm violence in America, is often not use in defense of a person or property, but rather is used far more often in the offense of perpetuating some sort of crime against another person or property. So too, it has to be acknowledged that firearms are exceedingly good at what they are designed to do, which is to physically harm the other, typically to the point of death or to death, which means that those owning firearms have, in theory, at least psychologically determined that they are willing to kill the other, in order to protect their own.
One would think, that it would behoove this nation to come up with conceivable alternatives to firearms that would still be good enough to protect a person and their property, but would be designed in a way and manner that the lethality of that instrument would not be its design objective, but instead, the object of the exercise in the use of that device, would be to neutralize the other. While there are devices such as a Taser, which have been designed to do something like that, there still is a need to design a weapon beyond the Taser that will impact the other with concentrated energy that would incapacitate them, without killing them or making them to suffer intense pain, such as we saw in the TV program, Star Trek, with the usage of the phaser.
As it is, to believe somehow that all these people with all these firearms, aren’t ever going to use them, even though they are right there next to them or on them, is a mirage, because people typically buy firearms for the expressed reason to use them, if so necessary or desired, which signifies that American firearms violence will not ever go away, until the per capita ownership of such is reduced to a very considerable extent